When it comes to addressing hair loss, the choice between a hair transplant and individual grafts can be a tricky one. From my personal experience, there are pros and cons to each option that are worth considering.
Hair Transplants:
Pros:
– Provide a more natural-looking, fuller head of hair in the long run
– Typically require fewer procedures compared to individual grafts
– Results are generally more permanent and long-lasting
Cons:
– More invasive procedure with a longer recovery time (around 2 weeks)
– Can be more expensive upfront
– Potential for unnatural-looking “plugs” if not done properly
Hair Grafts:
Pros:
– Less invasive, with a quicker recovery time (around 1 week)
– Can be a more cost-effective option, especially for smaller areas
– Allows for more targeted placement of hair follicles
Cons:
– Results may not be as dense or natural-looking as a full transplant
– Requires multiple procedures to achieve desired coverage
– Grafts can sometimes fail to take root
Ultimately, the decision comes down to your specific needs, budget, and desired outcomes. Hair transplants tend to provide more comprehensive, long-term results, but individual grafts can be a good option for addressing smaller, more localized areas of hair loss. I’d recommend consulting with a reputable hair restoration specialist to get their professional opinion and help you weigh the pros and cons for your situation.

The answer depends on the reason for hair fall, is it genetic or caused by damaged hair, So you need an appointment with the surgeon to decide about what your hair really need, But if it’s genetic , You will need full hair transplant to avoid hair falling in the future, The cost is different between both hair line only or full hair, so if you have low budget for now , I suggest you start by hair line transplant only.