The key differences between hair graft and hair plantation procedures lie in the approach and technique used.
Hair graft procedures involve taking small sections or “grafts” of hair-bearing skin from one part of the scalp and transplanting them to areas with thinning or balding hair. This is a more traditional method that has been used for decades. The grafts are carefully extracted and then implanted into recipient sites on the scalp.
On the other hand, hair plantation procedures use a different technique. Instead of extracting full grafts, this method involves individually extracting and transplanting individual hair follicles. This is a more meticulous and time-consuming process, but it can potentially yield a more natural-looking result since the individual hairs are transplanted rather than entire sections of skin.
The main advantage of hair plantation is that it can create a more seamless, undetectable hairline compared to the more obvious “plugs” that can sometimes occur with traditional graft procedures. However, hair plantation requires more skill and experience from the surgeon to execute properly.
Ultimately, both methods can be effective for restoring hair, but the choice between the two often comes down to the individual patient’s needs, the surgeon’s expertise, and personal preference. It’s best to consult with a qualified hair restoration specialist to determine the most suitable approach.

That’s an easy and good question , But you should know they are no two different processes, As Hair graft is a part of the plantation process , Hair graft needs the donor and recipient areas and then implant the follicle by one of the two methods “ FUE” or “ FUT”, But the Hair plantation means The whole process of the hair transplant which also means Direct Hair Implantation “ DHI”, So there’s no difference between both , It’s only part of it.